Published on January 16, 2025
A synthetic dye, Red 3 (also known as erythrosine or FD&C Red No. 3), recently banned in the United States by the FDA, is still considered safe for use in Canada. Despite the U.S. ban due to studies linking it to cancer in lab rats, Health Canada has stated that current scientific evidence does not suggest any health risks for humans. Let’s break down the facts.
Why Did the FDA Ban Red 3?
The FDA banned Red 3 because two studies found that prolonged exposure caused cancer in lab rats. However, the mechanism of cancer development was deemed “rat-specific” and not applicable to humans. The FDA’s ban was a legal necessity under U.S. law, which prohibits any food additive found to cause cancer in humans or animals, regardless of how the risk translates across species.
Health Canada’s Stance on Red 3
Health Canada has no immediate plans to ban Red 3, citing a 2018 safety evaluation by the Joint United Nations/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). This review examined data from studies involving both humans and animals, finding no evidence of health risks when used as a food additive.
Health Canada stated that it prioritizes the health and safety of Canadians. Should new evidence emerge suggesting a risk, the agency would act swiftly to restrict its use in food and drugs.
Red 3 in Foods: What Does It Do?
Red 3 is primarily used to give candies, cakes, cookies, and frostings their bright, cherry-red color. However, critics argue it serves no nutritional purpose, with some experts advocating for natural alternatives like beet juice extract and berry-derived anthocyanins.
Differing Opinions Among Experts
McGill University’s Joe Schwarcz
Dr. Schwarcz, a well-known advocate for evidence-based science, acknowledges that Red 3 poses no proven health risk but argues it should be banned in Canada for ethical reasons. He believes food additives should only be used if they provide functional benefits beyond appearance.
McMaster University’s Waliul Khan
Dr. Khan, a pathology professor, suggests caution, highlighting concerns about synthetic dyes like Red 3 and Red 40 (allura red). His 2022 study found that prolonged exposure to Red 40 in mice could aggravate inflammatory bowel diseases. While his findings don’t directly translate to humans, he advocates for warning labels and further research.
Natural Alternatives to Red 3
For consumers seeking safer or more natural options, alternatives include:
• Beet juice extract
• Anthocyanins from berries
• Carrot-derived colorants
These alternatives are free from toxicity concerns and align better with a push for healthier, less processed foods.
The Need for More Research
While Health Canada and JECFA currently deem Red 3 safe, experts like Dr. Khan call for more human studies to confirm long-term effects. However, ethical and financial challenges make such research difficult. The recent FDA ban could provide the momentum needed to secure funding for further investigations.
What Does This Mean for Canadians?
For now, Red 3 remains in Canadian food products. Health Canada emphasizes that the additive poses no risk based on available scientific evidence but promises action if new data surfaces. Consumers concerned about synthetic dyes can opt for natural alternatives or monitor product labels for transparency.
Legal Disclaimer
The information in this blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical or legal advice. Always consult Health Canada guidelines and speak to a healthcare professional if you have concerns about food additives.
At Pill4me Pharmacy, we believe in empowering you with the latest health information to make informed choices. Visit us for more updates, health products, and guidance tailored to your needs.